Pelosi and the left

The old cliche question coming out of Washington D.C. when a political interest smells political red meat is always "what did they know and when did they know it?" I guess that question is being pasted all over House Speaker Nancy Pelosi this morning, as she and the CIA trade insults over what exactly Pelosi was told about "enhanced interrogation" techniques that she was briefed on by CIA in 2002. 

The insinuation through all of this is that Pelosi is some kind of political opportunist, opposing "torture" when it's safe to do so but staying silent when the political winds were blowing a different direction. Now, so the critics assert, she is opposed to torture, but back then, she didn't seem to have much to say about it. 

I actually started to get whiffs of this controversy through the blogs and on my email lists a number of days before it hit the mainstream media, as usual. The speculation on the blogs was that the reason that the Dems were downplaying investigating the illegal use of torture by the Bush administration is because they knew about it and did nothing - guilt by association. The mainstream media is reporting that the left wing of the Dem. party is criticizing Pelosi for her acquiescence. It isn't the first time she would have been criticized by the left. In fact, I myself have been very upset by some of her tactics over the years.

For example, she showed little respect for Cynthia McKinney when Ms. McKinney regained her Congressional seat, stripping her of her seniority. In fact, with Pelosi the leader of the Dems in the House, the Dems pretty much abandoned Ms. McKinney when she was challenged again, and Pelosi once again stayed silent in the face of the bogus charges that Ms. McKinney had "slugged" a Capitol policeman. I wrote a piece in "Counterpunch" about it. (that was before I started "Rural Thoughts.) A lot of the information in that piece came directly from an email that Ms. McKinney sent me. I think it was wrong, low down and dirty, and will, in the long run hurt the Dems to have driven Ms. McKinney to the Greens, although one could hope that the Dems will come around someday and the left can reunite. The audacity of hope! Anyway, you can read the story at the link below.
http://www.counterpunch.org/donham12092004.html

While one has to admire Ms. Pelosi's power and skill, and it is good to have a woman in that position, she still, to me, represents establishment thinking - "inside the box" so to speak. It just seems as if she is too far into the big money corporate world, and therefore has the standard bias toward the corporate big money world that most big time politicians have which favors maintaining the status quo. Unfortunately, the status quo is hurling us at breakneck speed toward disaster. 

I do not believe this is anywhere near a scandel that will cause Pelosi to lose her Speaker position, unless some tapes or film come forward that shows that she flat out lied to the press. That could undo her, but short of that, this is sort of a tempest in a teapot. But there is a bigger issue behind all of this - whether or not Pelosi is leading the Dems on a path supported by many in the party - a path to the left. If she goes too conservative, she may find that when she turns around, the ground behind her has been crumbling.

Curt Jones featured in USA Today

I think it was this last Monday's USA Today, Curt Jones, (whom I have never met and wouldn't know if I saw him) "inventor" and founder of the Dippin' Dots, the ultra frozen ice cream "bbs" was featured on the front page of the Money section. It was a very detailed story, and the reporter reported it from Paducah. They also visited Metropolis, because they had a picture of the Dippin' Dots store in Superman City. 

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/management/entre/2009-05-10-dipp...

I do love ice cream, and I have had Dippin' Dots a couple times, which I found too cold for my taste, although good. I'd take Haagen Das or Ben and Jerry's every time if offered a choice between them or Dippin' Dots. Hand me a cup of Dippin' Dots on a hot day and I'm sure I'd enjoy them!

There were a number of things about Dippin' Dots that I didn't realize. First, I didn't realize that apparently most of their business comes from exporting - particularly to Asia. I also didn't realize that Dippin' Dots was cool with the Santa Cruz folks. I didn't realize that Oprah had Dippin Dots on her show. But I guess they are selling a lot of it all around the world.

If you drive by the Dippin' Dots plant out on the Coleman Road Industrial area, you see what obviously is a pretty sophisticated, and expensive) high quality plant. Shiny, stainless containers and piping look impressive. But it's no secret that they have to get the ice cream really cold, just tasting it shows that. It takes a lot of gizmo and resources to do that. Jones had the gizmo patented, or so he thought.

The article pointed out that the costs of operating were going up. This, in and of itself, probably wouldn't have threatened his business. But the bombshell of the article to me, was that Jones had that patent challenged in court, and lost. That let a number of competitors into the market, and now Dippin' Dots no longer has the market cornered. Costs going up, revenues down, big legal bills - it meant layoffs. 

Jones is going to try his gizmo out on other products, like coffee. It sounded a lot like the old freeze dried coffee, if you remember that. I never was much of an instant coffee fan - I like the taste of fresh brewed - the I do recall that a good cup of freeze dried was better than no coffee at the right time. 

Maybe Jones has learned about patents and knows now how to get around other people's patents. We all live and die by the law, for all of it's flaws. Sounds like work for lawyers and advertising firms. Good for the economy. 

For those of us that are curious about parts of our community that make it into the prominent national spotlight, this was a pretty big one on the spotlight scale - 7.5 out of 10. I came away from the article with a positive view of Jones, all in all, but like I said, I don't know him at all. I hope that he can find a way to reduce his power consumption. Honestly, it doesn't seem to be a "greenhouse gas" friendly business. I don't have figures about their power consumption, but I'm sure, for the size of the business, it's higher than most others of the same or similar size.

Maybe the local media has covered Jones' battle with patent challenges - I don't remember hearing about it. Was it local attorneys defending the patent? Was it local attorneys that prepared the patent application in the first place? 

Patent law is very specialized. You need an attorney that can understand the technology enough to articulate it, and explain how the device or system is unique and distinguish it from other similar devices or systems. But federal judges don't really like to get involved in agency stuff, and so, based on my experience of legal work in federal court challenging the Forest Service and other federal agencies, I'm a bit surprised to hear that a patent gets overturned by a judge. I don't know exactly how that works, but I am pretty sure that the error or omission must have been pretty obvious, or the judge wouldn't have gotten involved. 

I wonder why all of this wasn't covered more in the local media? Obviously, it's a national story, and a pretty big one. It's going to be interesting to see how Dippin' Dots survives in the years to come. If I was him, I'd be working on making those Dots a little less cold and little softer. They're best when they're just starting to melt together a little, and you can eat them with a spoon. Probably cost less to make them that way, too. 

Good luck Mr. Jones. It was very interesting reading about your endeavors.

Lies, damn lies and statistics

by Berry Craig

Congress wants the Occupational Safety and Health Administration to step up enforcement of record-keeping rules to prevent employers from underreporting job-related illnesses and injuries.
Last year, the U.S. House Education and Labor Committee heard testimony that OSHA "may be counting and reporting as few as one-third of workplace injuries and illnesses," the AFL-CIO's Mike Hall wrote on the labor federation's Internet website. 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics compiles and publishes annual illness, injury and death figures. 

"Top officials at the Department of Labor (DOL) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) often cite declining injury, illness and fatality numbers to demonstrate the effectiveness of their programs and to fight off criticism that OSHA has abandoned its original mission of setting and enforcing workplace safety and health standards," says HIDDEN TRAGEDY: Underreporting of Workplace Injuries and Illnesses, a 2008 House Labor and Education Committee majority staff report. "But extensive evidence from academic studies, media reports and worker testimony shows that work-related injuries and illnesses in the United States are chronically and even grossly underreported." 

Hall says the BLS numbers are seriously flawed because they come from one source - employers. 

He points to a Michigan State University study, published in the April, 2006, edition of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. The study found that BLS figures covering several years in Michigan captured just 31 percent of the injuries and 33 percent of the illnesses reported in other databases that included more than just the employer-provided information upon which the BLS relies. Hall says a similar study published in 2008 examined figures from Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The BLS numbers in those states didn't report 25-50 percent of workplace injuries and illnesses, he adds. He also points to the 2009 edition of the AFL-CIO's Death on the Job: The Toll of Neglect. "Under the Bush administration, officials at OSHA largely ignored the issue of underreporting, continuing to rely on employer reports of workplace injuries as evidence that policies were working, despite overwhelming evidence that this information is unreliable. Moreover, there were no efforts or initiatives to enhance enforcement on OSHA injury and illness recordkeeping requirements," the 18th annual report says. 

Death on the Job also says that in 2007, the last year for which job fatality statistics are available, 5,657 workers lost their lives at work from traumatic injuries. 

"While this is a decline in worker deaths from 2006, when 5,840 fatal injuries were reported, on average 15 workers die every day because of job injuries. "

In 2007, more than 4 million work-related injuries and illnesses were reported by employers, but due to limitations in the injury reporting system and underreporting of workplace injuries, this number understates the problem. The true toll is estimated to be two to three times greater or 8 to 12 million injuries and illnesses." 

The Labor and Education Committee report also says "As much as 69 percent of injuries and illnesses may never make it into the Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (SOII), the nation's annual workplace safety and health 'report card' generated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)." 

The report adds, "If these estimates are accurate, the nation's workers may be suffering three times as many injuries and illnesses as official reports indicate. Despite these reports, OSHA has failed to address the problem, relying on ineffective audits to argue that the numbers are accurate." In addition, the report says, "a major cause of underreporting, according to experts, is OSHA's reliance on self-reporting by employers [who].have strong incentives to underreport injuries and illnesses that occur on the job. Businesses with fewer injuries and illnesses are less likely to be inspected by OSHA; they have lower workers' compensation insurance premiums; and they have a better chance of winning government contracts and bonuses." 

Further, the report says self-reporting permits "employers to use a variety of strategies that result in underreporting of injuries and illnesses: Workers report widespread intimidation and harassment when reporting injuries and illnesses. Reports, testimony and news accounts show that many employers have fired or disciplined workers who report injuries and illnesses or complain about safety hazards. Others have added 'demerits' to an employee's record for reportable injuries or illnesses or for absenteeism that allegedly result from 'safety violations.'" 

AFL-CIO President John Sweeney questions BLS figures that show shrinking illness, injury and death rates in American workplaces on President George W. Bush's watch. In a posting on the AFL-CIO's website, he said the Bush administration proved unwilling "to protect and safeguard America's working men and women, adding, "Fortunately, America has a new Secretary of Labor who is committed to putting the needs of working families at the forefront of her agenda." 

Meanwhile, part of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, which Congress recently approved, orders OSHA, which is under the Department of Labor, to start "a recordkeeping enforcement initiative on injury and illness reporting, addressing the apparent lack of completeness of the OSHA Log of Work-related Injuries and Illnesses." 

The bill gives extra money to OSHA and the BLS for the initiative. It also requires OSHA to report to Congress on the new recordkeeping enforcement initiative in June. 

Besides Sweeney, many union leaders and rank-and-file members are skeptical of the BLS numbers. They include Steelworker Jeff Wiggins, president of the Paducah-based Western Kentucky Area Council, AFL-CIO. Wiggins, who is also on the Kentucky State AFL-CIO Executive Board, said the numbers remind him of a famous Mark Twain quote: "There are three kinds of lies - lies, damn lies and statistics."

Wanda Sykes at the DC Correspondents dinner

Kristi and I just got done watching Wanda Sykes' comedy speech at the DC Correspondence dinner. She followed Obama's speech. Ms. Sykes' speech was some of the most rough and tumble political humor I have ever heard. But it was hilarious, controversial, and right on point. 

Afterward, MSNBC interviewed Pat Buchanan, who seemed aghast at what Ms. Sykes had said. He said she went "over the top." Oh really? 

Was Mr. Buchanan offended because an intelligent and informed African American female spoke her mind? That's what it seemed like to me. And then this Ms. Bebitch, a stodgy white female, agreed with Buchanan. 

Both of them need to grow up and get off their white horse. Ms. Sykes, your humor was awesome! Buchanan, your commentary sucked. What a downer you can be. And Ms. Bebitch, I know little about you, but I'm disappointed. 

Thank goodness for people like Ms. Sykes who have the guts to speak the truth.

 

Paducah labor council endorses KCCFSA censure vote against KCTCS Board of Regents

by Berry Craig

PADUCAH, Ky. -- A statewide community college teachers'
union has enlisted a Paducah-based union group in its fight to restoretenure rights for new hires.

The Western Kentucky Area Council, AFL-CIO, unanimously endorsed a resolution from American Federation of Teachers Local 6010 that censures the Kentucky Community and Technical College System Board of Regents for voting to end tenure for faculty employed after June 30.

"We deeply appreciate the support of our union brothers and sisters in western Kentucky," said Barbara Ashley, executive director of Local 6010, also known as the Kentucky Community College Faculty and Staff Alliance. "We hope the other central labor councils in the state will follow." 

In addition to stopping tenure, the board abolished
continuing employment status and paid post-retirement health insurance for new employees.

Since the regents voted in March, faculty members at 12 of the state's 16 community and technical colleges have approved no confidence resolutions in the board. Faculty at another school voted to oppose and condemn the board's action.

"The opposition to the board's action is unprecedented,"
Ashley said. "Votes of no confidence and opposition and condemnation are very serious steps. We hope the board is paying attention. We know members of the legislature are."

State Rep. Rick Nelson, D-Middlesboro, has said he plans to prefile a bill restoring tenure, continuing employment status and
post-retirement benefits before next year's regular session of the General Assembly.

"We are glad to stand in solidarity with AFT," said Jeff
Wiggins, Western Kentucky Area Council president. The council is comprised of unions from several deep western Kentucky counties. 

Here is the censure resolution approved by the Local 6010
Executive Board: 

The KCTCS Board of Regents voted on March 13, 2009, to
eliminate tenure and continuing status for faculty and staff, beginning in July 2009.

WHEREAS most KCTCS college faculty councils, the KCTCS System Faculty Council, the Community College Faculty/Staff Alliance, the Technical Faculty/Staff Alliance, and the faculty senates of Eastern Kentucky, Murray State and Northern Kentucky Universities publicly expressed opposition to removing tenure, and

WHEREAS the Kentucky State AFL-CIO, noting the importance of invested,experienced employees for quality job performance, requested that the KCTCS Board of Regents withdraw its proposal to eliminate tenure, and

WHEREAS the Kentucky House of Representatives, noting the importance of tenure to attract and retain high quality educators, strongly urged the KCTCS Board of Regents to retain its tenure system, and

WHEREAS it is well established that tenure was introduced and remains a standard in the vast majority of colleges and universities as a necessary means to ensure the best quality faculty and to protect the academic freedom of students and faculty, and

WHEREAS current research shows that a tenure system is positively related to student retention and student success, and

WHEREAS some or all of the community colleges in surrounding states offer tenure and/or continuing status, and

WHEREAS all of the public universities and public schools in Kentucky offer tenure, and

WHEREAS the KCTCS Board of Regents provided no substantiation to show how the elimination of tenure would save money, meaningfully increase the extensive hiring flexibility KCTCS already exercises, improve the quality of education for students, or have any positive result whatsoever, and

WHEREAS the term contract system of employment proposed by the KCTCS Board of Regents has no mechanism to preclude a system of cronyism from taking hold nor any remotely viable means to protect academic freedom, and

WHEREAS the KCTCS Board of Regents decision to eliminate tenure in the face of overwhelming opposition from the very faculty and staff that make the KCTCS work demonstrates highly questionable leadership skills, and

WHEREAS the KCTCS Board of Regents decision to eliminate tenure in the face of strong opposition from the legislature3 that originally envisioned and statutorily created the KCTCS itself demonstrates highly questionable leadership skills, and

WHEREAS the KCTCS Board of Regents violated the spirit of HB1 (1997), the legislation that created the KCTCS.

NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, the Kentucky Community College Faculty/Staff Alliance - AFT 6010 hereby:

. Declares no confidence in the deliberations or policies promulgated by the KCTCS Board of Regents and

. CENSURES the KCTCS Board of Regents for the poor managerial practices it has exhibited and for diminishing the academic integrity and credibility of the KCTCS.

Community College Faculty/Staff Alliance - AFT 6010

RNCers demand Dems confess they're rebuilding American society "along socialist ideals"

by Berry Craig

Some Republican National Committee members want to make "socialist" the official GOP slam for President Barack Obama and his party.

They're pushing a resolution claiming the Democrats are out to restructure "American society along socialist ideals." The measure, which its supporters hope to bring up at an RNC meeting this month, also invites the Democrats to "rename themselves the Democratic Socialist Party."

My guess is the Democrats will stay "Democrats." Brian Moore says they
should.

"Obama is not even a liberal, much less a socialist," claimed Moore, the
Socialist Party U.S.A. candidate for president last year. The Democratic Party isn't socialist either, according to Moore.

Democrats support "a free market economy [and] for profit corporations," he said. Democrats also uphold capitalism, "which rewards the few at the expense of the many," according to Moore.

Doubtless Democrats disagree that they favor rich people over poor people. But they probably would go along with Moore's charge that Republicans are guilty of cold war-style "red-baiting" and "fear mongering" when they diss Democrats as "socialists."

Of course, demonizing one's political enemies is nothing new. It goes back to the earliest days of our republic.

Thomas Jefferson's more staid Federalist foes dubbed him and his
Democratic-Republican "rabble" America's "Jacobin" party. The Jacobins were radical French revolutionaries who sent King Louis XVI, Queen Marie Antoinette and many nobles to the Guillotine.

Before the Civil War, Republicans weren't just "Republicans" to pro-slavery Democrats. They were "Black Republicans" because they opposed putting Africans in bondage.

Obama isn't the first Democratic president the GOP tagged a "socialist." In the 1930s and 1940s, anti-New Deal Republicans said Franklin D. Roosevelt was a "socialist" because he supported unions and fought the Depression with government programs like the WPA, TVA and Social Security.

After Sen. Joe McCarthy, the GOP's red-baiter-in-chief, was exposed as a fraud, the Republicans retreated to "liberal" as their standby slur for
Democrats. I'm not sure why the party returned to "socialist" for bashing Democrats.

Maybe it's because the Republicans are afraid Obama may be another FDR, who was one of America's most important and most beloved presidents. In any event, slamming Democrats as "socialists" is more proof of just how far right the party of Lincoln and Liberty has swerved.

Sunday News Shows

The news shows today were focused primarily on Arlen Specter and the Souter retirement. The flu outbreak had been reduced in importance, but was still discussed.

I already wrote about Specter. I hope that someone in the Democratic party challenges him good in the primary, because I think it would be in the Dems best interest to get him out of the picture. He's a political opportunist who isn't to be trusted.

And while Souter has become part of the "liberal" 4 of the Supreme Court, his replacement isn't exactly unwelcome to me. Souter is worst known for, at least recently, for upholding the expansive use of eminent domain to allow governments to take poor people's homes to give the land to powerful and rich corporations to turn it into money making land. That flies in the face of the "American Dream" to the extent that exists. So, while it isn't really a "good riddance" scenario, Obama should be able to replace with a better justice.

The discussion amongst the talking heads was whether or not he would pick someone from the left or right, and whether race and gender would play into the pick. According to the pundits, Obama will pick a woman with an African American mom, an hispanic dad, and is liberal. Not a bad idea. What he should do is just pick someone out of the working class that is totally separate from the big time D.C. scene. That's what we need, not more of the same academic, politically comprised crap that we've been getting. I'm tired of Supreme Court justices sitting in ivory towers totally unaware of what it is like to live like a normal working class person. And then, on top of that, they don't think we should even have access to the courts. Pox on them. 

I'm not even going to comment on the "swine flu" thing except to say that Charles Krauthamer said that Obama's response to the swine flu would be his Katrina. What world is he living in? At least Obama is trying to do something. Bush sat by and let people suffer for many days needlessly. But then again, what do you expect from Krauthhamer. He's a foolish fool.

Political Update/the first 100 days

It's been eventful on the political front lately. Of course, the media did the whole "first 100 days" thing, which is pretty much a useless but nevertheless regular kind of assessment that they do on new presidents. Obama passed with flying colors.

I listened to Obama's 100th day prime time press conference Wednesday night, and, like most everyone, I am impressed at his intellect, capacity to understand and comment intelligently on a seemingly infinite number of subjects, and still maintain a more or less middle class view of the country and the people. 

I think for the most part the nation is sighing a huge sigh of relief that we can quit gritting our teeth and seething everytime our president shows up in public - i.e. George W. Bush. 

One of the most noteworthy political events of the week was the switch of Arlen Specter, long time U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania, from Republican to Democrat. He self-admittedly is doing it because he doesn't think he can win the Republican primary, and he wants to keep his senate seat. 

Obama says he welcomes him and will campaign for him. We'll see. I don't know that much about Pennsylvania state politics, but I would bet that there are high ranking Democrats who feel they deserve that seat and are going to challenge Specter in the primary. I also think that Specter, even with Obama's support, and I have a hard time believing that Obama is going to put heart and soul into it, stands a good chance of going down in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary. I, for one, hope he does. Let's get some new Democrat blood in there. Already Specter has voted against Obama twice since he "switched." 

So all the pundits are bemoaning the demise of the Republican party. It was only a matter of time. Their mean spirited survival of the fittest mentality is way out of place in today's world. 

And then here comes Newt Gingrich, in a number of mainstream, big time media appearances, including the Today Show, a rebuttal editorial in USA Today, and the Stephanopolis, (and likely others, also) calling Obama "radical" and saying that Obama is doing long term damage to the country. And Gingrich is one of the Republican frontrunners to lead the party and run against Obama? Oh pulleeaassee. 

I still don't agree with everything Obama is doing. I do still question, along with the true conservatives, whether or not we are accumulating too much debt. I still see the system relying on consumerism to prop up the economy, and I don't believe that is sustainable. I'm not convinced that war is the answer to anything. But, I admire President Obama for his sincerity, his compassion, and his intelligence. For someone like Newt Gingrich to think that he can bring him down by calling him "radical" enough times shows that he is suffering from the same delusions as, say, Rush Limbaugh.

MLA and Baylor student paper oppose KCTCS board vote to axe tenure

by Berry Craig

What do the Modern Language Association and the Baylor
University student newspaper have in common?

Both think the Kentucky Community and Technical College System's Board of Regents made a bad move when it voted to end tenure for new faculty.

The MLA's Executive Council "deplores the Kentucky Regents' decision to abolish tenure for all future hires in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System."

The Modern Language Association is a national group that
encourages the study and teaching of language and literature. The MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers is the scribe's Bible in thousands of high school, college and university English classes. KCTCS colleges use it. So does the English department at Baylor, a Baptist university in Waco, ex.

In March, the KCTCS board eliminated tenure for faculty hired on or after July 1. Few, if any, teachers doubt that Dr. Michael McCall, the KCTCS president, supported, if not encouraged, the board action.

"KCTCS faculty will continue to have the same rights and
privileges afforded to faculty in other higher education institutions
through existing organizational policies regarding academic freedom, promotion, shared governance and due process," said Board Chair Richard Bean in a KCTCS news release.

Not many KCTCS faculty are buying Bean's claim. So far, nine of the system's 16 community and technical colleges have approved resolutions of no confidence in the board and McCall. A tenth school voted to oppose and condemn the board's actions. All resolutions passed by hefty margins.

Meanwhile, the MLA and the Lariat didn't mince words in their criticism of the board.

"Neither administrative expediency that takes advantage of the current financial crisis nor short-term budgetary gains justify a decision that threatens to undermine faculty governance and peer review, forestall curricular innovation, and impede the academic advancement of students," the MLA council said.

Likewise, the Baylor Lariat editorialized, "It might appear as
simply a financial move to save the university money, but it would cost a college what makes it a college. It will cease being a place of diverse learning."

The editorial added, "Students are more stimulated from open discussion than a formula of dogmatic doctrine. Colleges are designed to be well-rounded places of learning, and tenure is conducive to the free exchange of ideas intrinsic to higher education.

"Non-tenured teachers can lead engaging classroom conversation, but tenure is the only guarantee professors won't lose their jobs for guiding a class conversation on a taboo topic or for expressing unconventional opinions."

The MLA brass concluded, "There is every reason to suppose that KCTCS students will be ill served by a situation in which the teaching faculty is expected to be committed to the educational enterprise while serving at the pleasure of an institution unwilling to make long-term commitments to its most essential employees."

The Lariat argued that without tenure, it will be difficult for
Kentucky's community and technical colleges to attract quality teachers. While McCall was the highest paid community college system president in the country in 2008, KCTCS faculties are not - by a long shot - the most handsomely compensated community college teachers in the U.S.

KCTCS teachers overwhelmingly opposed the elimination of tenure and told the board so before it voted. The KCTCS Faculty Senate passed a strong pro-tenure resolution. Faculty organizations at most of the community and technical colleges endorsed the resolution or passed resolutions of their own.

The board ignored the pro-tenure resolutions. It may choose to ignore the no confidence votes. Maybe the regents and McCall think the fuss over tenure is a tempest in a teapot, and that eventually the teachers will get over it.

I wouldn't bet the farm on that.

Several of us who teach in the community and technical colleges belong to American Federation of Teachers Locals 6010 and 6083. Our union leaders started knocking on lawmakers' doors in Frankfort soon after the board voted. They huddled with State Rep. Rick Nelson, D-Middlesboro, chair of the powerful Labor and Industry Committee.

Nelson helped get the House of Representatives approve a
non-binding, voice-vote resolution of support for continuing tenure in the community and technical colleges. It was too late to file a tenure restoration bill. But Nelson told the Harlan Daily Advertiser he will pre-file one before the next regular session of the legislature, which will be in 2010.

Meanwhile, I suspect more than a few teachers at our community and technical colleges will manage to find time during their summer breaks to contact their members of the legislature. More than a few of us who are in AFT already have communicated with our representatives and senators, and we are finding friends.

"The more we can publicly discredit the BOR's policies the less effective the BOR will be fighting us in the legislature or anywhere else," said Barbara Ashley, a sociology professor at Jefferson Community College and director of Local 6010's committee on Political Education.

I'll add a Presbyterian "amen" to that.

Enough David Brooks

I watched the McLaughlin Group just a bit ago. I thought it was a pretty good show, not the best, but not bad. 

But I have to comment about David Brooks commentary about Obama releasing the torture memos. I have to disclose, for the sake of fairness, that I am pretty sick of the David Brooks overkill that we are forced to endure on our antennas. That said, I realize that he gets a lot of airplay for some reason. Who knows? Relatives in the business? It can't be because of his saavy insight, because he doesn't have it.

He was talking about how Obama had "flipped flopped" on whether he would endorse prosecuting anyone over the torture issue. And while I do think that Obama did cut a fine line, too close for comfort if you ask me, he never did say never. 

But Brooks tried to paint what Obama had said as some kind of huge pandering to the "left" of the party. What a joke. The left of the party is frustrated by Obama's refusal to go further left. 

Brooks is wrong when he postulates that a large percentage of the U.S. is going to be outraged if Obama allows honest investigations into Bush and his abuses. The overwhelming number of people want it. Brooks is just afraid, because he is so closely aligned with the Republican party, that the complete demise of that party, or even a significant decline beyond the current decline, is going to eventually land him in the position of many a U.S. citizen - unemployed. The sooner the better that he relates to what it is really like out here.

Why do we always have to hear David Brooks? Geez, I'm tired of him. He's old news. Let's get some new voices in there.

Robert Welch and Billy James Hargis would have loved the tea parties

by Berry Craig

You'd think after "Maverick" McCain ran to the right and got clobbered last November, the Republicans would try to hit the comeback trail by edging toward the center.

Think again. The "tea party day" tax protests were more proof, if proof were needed, that the party of Lincoln and Liberty is bound for the farthest shores of American politics.

Robert Welch and the Rev. Billy James Hargis would have loved tea party day, a made-for-TV movement bankrolled by rich, right-wing Republicans like Dick Armey and his friends at FreedomWorks and ballyhooed by Fox News, the GOP's propaganda ministry.

Welch founded the John Birch Society in the 1950s. He suggested that President Dwight D. Eisenhower, a moderate Republican, was a "conscious, dedicated agent of the Communist Conspiracy." (Birchers said fluoridated drinking water was part of the conspiracy.)

Hargis, who belonged to the Birch Society, was a segregationist preacher who started the Christian Crusade, also in the 1950s. He said the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were communist.

Not coincidentally, the tea parties were on April 15, the annual income tax deadline. Officially, the protests were "TEA Parties." "TEA" stands for "taxed enough already."

Party goers also took aim at other familiar right-wing Republican and libertarian targets including socialism, one-worldism, gun control, abortion, single-payer health care, the United Nations, evolution, illegal immigrants, environmentalists, the Employee Free Choice Act, France and same sex marriage.

Party planners meant for partygoers to focus most of their ire on
"socialist-in chief" Obama. They were not disappointed. At the same time, the tea parties were feel good therapy for the Obama-bashers. It was a chance for group hugs and commiserating over last Nov. 4.

Many of the partygoers brought signs. The Huffington Post Internet blogsite put up several photos of them.

"OBAMA'S PLAN WHITE SLAVERY" said a placard carried by a white guy. Almost all tea partygoers were white.

Based on other signs, a lot of protestors were of the Jesus-loves-me-but-He-can't-stand-you persuasion. "King Obama Move Over &
Give God Back His Throne," a sign said. Another homemade sign asserted "Free Speach [sic] is Not a Crime." That one reminded me of a sign from the tea party in Paducah, Ky., where I teach
at the local community and technical college.

I saw the sign on TV. It was shaped like a tombstone with the epitaph
"R.I.P Capitolism." I don't know if the sign-maker thought he was being clever or if he needed a dictionary, too.

I suspect the Paducah program was especially cathartic. Kentucky is one of the reddest Red States. McCain carried the Bluegrass State big, even though the "socialist-closet-Muslim-one-worlder" won the election.

Like the other partygoers I saw on TV, the Paducah protestors were passionate. "Hey, my fellow extremists!" a woman yelled the crowd before the two main speakers, U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield and State Rep. Brent Housman, stepped to the microphone. Both Republicans gleefully joined the Obama and the government bashing. But Whitfield admitted to a local TV reporter that
he was passing out government checks before the tea party.

No doubt the tea party throwers and goers hoped to scare the Democrats. More likely they scared middle-of-the road, independent voters.

Polls suggest pretty strongly that the farther right the GOP goes, themore independents identify with Democratic policies. Hence, egging on events that showcase far-right wing extremists might not
be the best way for the Republicans to win back the White House and Congress. That's why I figure the Democrats can't wait for the second round of tea parties, which is scheduled for Independence Day.

Meanwhile, the tea party crowds seemed to have fun demonizing Obama. But the polls say most Americans think he's doing a good job. Obama's approval rating in the Gallup Poll has averaged 63 percent since he took office. Fifty-six percent of Americans support the president's stimulus plan, according to the Pew Research Center.

Polls also show most Americans blame "capitolist" Bush and Republican-run Congresses for our economic woes.

A final note: the tea parties were supposed to represent the "spirit" of the Boston Tea Party of 1773. Some at the Paducah party claimed they, too, were protesting "taxation without representation."

They need to read some history, the subject I teach. Or they might check a Louisville Courier-Journal editorial of April 15:
"At the heart of the Boston Tea Party, which has inspired today's tea motif, was the reality of taxation without representation; the colonists were being ripped off by the British government, not their own. We have representation. If enough of us feel they're ripping us off, we have the right to overturn them every couple of years, and we just did that."

In other words, if the protesters feel unrepresented it's because their man McCain was beaten fair and square.

In addition, the editorial writer found the protests "a little too
spleeny" but conceded everybody has a right to gripe about the government. "Protesting is as American as apple pie," the editorialist observed. "Many Americans are uncomfortable with the high cost to taxpayers of the bailouts," the editorial also said. "Yes, many Americans feel the spending is out of control, and that they have little control over how national leaders are handling the economic crisis. We get that."

But the editorial concluded, "Where was all this outrage when the
nation's savings account was opened and the dollars were flying out, when the nation's credit card was being swiped again and again to pay for wars that weren't even showing up in the nation's budget? Suddenly, there's a new president and, boom, instant tea parties."

Sunday News Shows

I'm going to make this a short entry having only seen Wall Street Journal report, Chris Matthews, and Stephanopolous.

I want to comment about the discussions on Matthews and Steph about Obama making public the torture memos and then turning around and saying that he wasn't going to prosecute anyone for what is obviously actions outside of our own constitution and in violation of international law and treaties.

First, Kudos big time to Andrew Sullivan, a fairly frequent guest on Matthews. Sullivan, a strange combination of true conservative and out-of-the-closet gay, stood up to Matthews and the others in insisting that letting the people who were responsible for these crimes go was bad for our country. He went so far as to say that the techniques for torture authorized in these memos came directly from the Hitler and the Nazis, and Stalin, something that Matthews didn't want to hear. 

In fact, I was surprised at how Matthews became sort of the typical American apologist, basically saying that we couldn't possibly be as bad as those folks even when the facts show that we probably were. I was a little taken aback by how Matthews tried to shoot down Sullivan's insistence that people, including and especially people at the top, (he named Cheney specifically), be held accountable. 

On Stephanopolous, most of the roundtable panelists also agreed that Obama was doing the "right thing" in letting these criminals walk. Only Sam Donaldson said that if you have no accountability, then the law means nothing, and these crimes will be repeated. Peggy Noonan said that sometimes it's best just to "keep walking," a reference to walking away from these crimes without doing anything. 

One more time, in a flashing, glaring billboard, these folks that say it is ok to let this pass are saying to someone like me, that yes, there is a caste system in our country when it comes to justice as well as other things. The low income kid caught with a joint gets swept up in the furvor of prosecution, and for what? Wanting to get a little buzz from a natural substance? 

Yet these people, who knowingly tortured in violation of national and international law, going against the fundamental tenant of American morals, which is that people are entitled to due process and protected from cruel and unusual punishment, have struck a blow at the heart of America and blackened our eyes around the world. Yet they are likely going to skate. Whose crime is worse? The double standard is so obvious, and it is infuriating that the mainstream media, who keeps touting the ills, for example, of marijuana, keeps saying that it's ok for these big time criminals to go free. 

The last words of our "Pledge of Allegiance" goes, "with liberty, AND JUSTICE FOR ALL." It doesn't say with justice for everyone but big shots, or justice for everyone except those that the mainstream media and the big time politicians don't think need to be brought to justice. It says JUSTICE FOR ALL. A L L. There are no exceptions in all. All means all - everyone. But if we let these big time criminals go that have helped to contribute to the crushing degradation of our country in so many ways, how can those in charge look the African American teenager in the eye that is being sent to jail for having a bag of pot? It makes a mockery of our constitution, our pledge, our system.

sunday news shows

I just want to comment on one aspect of what I heard today. On Chris Matthews, they spent a lot of time discussing the status of the republican party, and who might be in line to (more than likely) fall on the sword against Obama in 2012. 

Of course, the participants said it all depends what happens to the economy. If the economy, after Obama puts all this effort into it, does not recover, then the republicans have a chance. If the economy recovers, it will be a blow out for the Obama and the dems. 

One name mentioned by more than one panelist as a potential challenger for the republicans was Newt Gingrich. Then, low and behold, shortly thereafter, he comes on as a "roundtable" member on Stephanopolous' show on ABC. And, today was a exceptionally long roundtable, taking most of the show. 

Gingrich was acting like a candidate already. He was attacking Obama on everything, even things that Bush should be to blame. At one point, George Will even had to say to Gingrich that he was wrong. But I find the whole timetable, with the Matthews discussion first naming Gingrich as a potential candidate, and then his appearance on Steph, as very curious. It does make one wonder about whether or not we really have an "independent" press.

Paducah "reorganization" plan

I'm saddened by the layoffs at Paducah city hall, especially the layoff of Herchel Dungey, Paducah's city Human Resources Director. Dungey was one of two minority department heads getting the axe. It's bad for anyone to lose their job, and I'm sorry for all of the folks dealing with this, but I want to write a bit about Mr. Dungey. I got to become acquainted with Herchel at the
meetings of the Paducah Interracial Men's Group, which I used to attend monthly, but haven't for awhile for a variety of reasons, mostly logistical and economic. But I find Mr. Dungey to be
articulate, intelligent, well educated, and progressive. Oh, did I mention that he is African-American, and from my understanding, recruited into Paducah from Chicago several years ago to try and move the city into the modern era of minority hiring. 

But now, he, of all people, in the entire city government, is one of several city employees, one of the highest level officials to go. The reason given is to "consolidate" departments to reduce
costs. No mention has been made that he didn't perform well in his job. It makes no sense, but it came originally "officially" as a recommendation from the city manager, James Zumwalt. This city manager has been in trouble, even within the last few months, for
at best, insensitivity to minorities. Mr. Dungey's comments to the press about being axed were blunt. "This is racism..." 

I never liked the "city manager" form of government. The people end up with an overpaid, unelected bureacrat that has too much influence in many cases. I really that is the case here. The people elect a mayor, and should pay the mayor what he needs to be paid to do the job. Giving a 6 figure salary to an unelected person to have so much control over a city like Paducah takes away the people's choice and reduces democracy. That's just my opinion. 

I see a lot of similarities in this situation with what is happening with the AIG bonuses. Consider this. The Paducah city government with the current city manager, has gotten into all kinds of
messes. The city is now running a large deficit, the Executive Inn debacle is on the verge of driving the quilt show away, a number of the key galleries in Lowertown have "for sale" signs in their yards, certain other neighborhoods in the city are getting less attention (and aid) than others, (and showing it), it has been reported that there are serious problems in the Paducah police
department, and the fire department has butted heads with city government often in the last several years. It isn't the best of times in Paducah. 

So isn't allowing the city manager, who has been in this influential position through all of this, to come up with a plan to fix this like letting the fox guard the chicken house? It makes little sense. With Mr. Zumwalt's recent verbal insensitivies, and with other controversies surrounding race in which his name has arose, such as his clash with the Paducah Human Rights Commission, to allow
him to come up with the plan to reorganize the city government which doesn't involve, but removes two minority department heads strips the plan of credibility from the beginning. He simply has too
much baggage, deserved or not, to display the kind of objectivity that such a process would have to demonstrate in order to survive the public scrutiny and keep from fracturing the community. And besides, perhaps the city manger should be at the top of the "to go" list. An independent commission could determine that. Certainly, he shouldn't be rewarded for a less than stellar performance.

The interesting but sad irony here is that I heard Mr. Dungey, more than once, speak about a time in his corporate career when he worked on a team which reviewed potential new sites for expansion. Cities and regions, according to Mr. Dungey, are rated on a number of factors, as to their favorability. It isn't just transportation and natural resources, though, that many corporations consider. Race relations are important, and our area doesn't rank that high. Having an African-American leader, a
man of Mr. Dungey's stature, say bluntly to local press, that his firing was racism is shocking to me. Always Mr. Dungey was dignified and restrained. Although always proud of his culture, he
always took a tone about race more like President Obama takes. Of the African-American non-preacher leaders in town with whom I am acquainted, Mr. Dungey always seemed to me to be very diplomatic. Never so blunt as this.

That Dungey would make such a statement so bluntly seems to me to be like a flashing billboard, that Paducah still doesn't get it on race relations. Not good for image of the city, the region or progressive economic development.

While it is a great step for the city government to have hired an African-American chief of police, to try and justify this firing because of that hiring rubs salt into an already festering wound. I do not know Mr. Dungey closely, but if we meet somewhere, we shake hands and exchange a warm greeting. I did speak to him a number of times at the interracial men's group of the years.
But he has been here long enough to become a respected part of the community, and it would be my guess that he will have a hard time, in this economy finding another job in his profession around
here. I hope he can, because we need him and more like him. Losing him is going to be a blow, not just to the African-American community, but to the white community. Mr. Dungey seems to me to be the kind of leader that we want to keep, not run out of town. The city government should have thought this through more and not just rubber stamped the city manager.

I don't know the percent of minorities that are in the positions that the city is ending. I assume that will come out. But there is more than just sheer numbers here. A community is more than just a census count. It is an interaction of individuals that influence each other in unique ways. A community builds when it develops trust. Trust is built on credibility and transparency. This reorganization is neither credible or transparent. It should be ditched and an independent commission appointed to investigate and make public how this plan was drafted, and to come up with a
new, better plan.

 

Today

So Sarah said to me today, "this is the anniversary of my fall." This referred to the day 5 years ago when her body gave way to an as up to that point undiagnosed cancer, and she fell to the ground, and became "almost paralyzed." That's when she found out she had cancer.

That lead to her being told that she had a few months to live. So here she is, 5 years later. Those 5 years have been a combination of the highest levels of accomplishment, difficulty and pain.

I had recently given her this book by Dr. Sandra Steingraber, called "Living Downstream." This book, written about a decade ago (or more) by a young female medical doctor battling breast cancer herself, explains a lot of the environmental issues surrounding breast cancer. Sarah said that she didn't realize what the book would mean to her when I gave it to her until she started reading it. It isn't really pleasant, though.

The author, a midwesterner, incredibly intelligent and sensitive, hails from Havana, Illinois. Havana is a town of between 5 - 10 thousand along the Illinois River in central Illinois. In another lifetime, (circa mid 70s) I drove the Western Illinois University student newspaper, the "Courier," from it's office on the square in Macomb, Illinois, to Havana to be printed. It was a little more than a half hour drive. 

The "Courier" had been kicked off campus for being too radical and was being published from a second floor office on the southeast corner of the square. There was, however, enough support in the community to keep the Courier going, thru all of this. Afterall, the Courier is "the" official student newspaper. It had to survive and be independent. I worked there for a time, had a car, and one of my jobs became driving the layout sheets to Havana. I also wrote a nutty column called "Bacon Fat." I have no idea what I wrote about, but I'm sure it was political. I've always written about politics.

That was around the time that WIU student president, Neil Stegall, who looked a lot like Frank Zappa, was elected homecoming queen. And let's not forget that when what is now Wetzel Hall was built, the administration, swept up in the spirit of brotherhood from that time of the 70s, held an election to name the new behemoth dorm. I guess they thought Lincoln or something like that would win. They probably were surprised when Hendrix won. That was quickly the end of that flash of democracy. At least that's what the scuttlebutt was. 

Also, it was about that time when 10 or so young, very liberal teachers from the English Dept., one of which was Julie Grainger, my favorite teacher during my time at Western, were fired after just one or two years. Julie's husband, (I think his name was Dan) long hair, beard, bluejeans, was faculty sponsor for the white panther group at Western. They were probably on the left of the group, but 8 or so others who also were young, aware, active, and progressive also were fired. It was a wholesale gutting of a Department of the best liked teachers. The reason: they weren't making "sufficient progress" on their phd. How obvious can you get? A bunch of students held protests and a sit-in but to no avail. It was like having your leaders ripped away from you. It was demoralizing, and I didn't last much longer at Western.

Other strange happenings occurred. One of the first Editors of the Courier that I became aware of was Paul Reynolds, who also played lead guitar player in local bands, even for awhile with Ken Pitlik, who later became Ken Carlisle of Caddilac Cowboy fame. Reynolds wrote an editorial column called "Reynolds Rap" and apparently had an unfortunate gunshot wound to his leg keeping him from being drafted. ouch! Another of my friends took the more painless path of starving himself to a toothpick. I just won the lottery and never had to worry about it. 

But then my off campus roommate and singing and performing partner in our duet "Donham and Chaffee," Rich Chaffee, who never was really an "activist," found himself as the first college student to ever address the Illinois state legislature during statewide anti-war protests. And I would have to mention the famous Blues Concert, Bukka White, Willie Dixon, Muddy Waters, and BB King. I think that was Bill Deutch's accomplishment, if I remember. Oh, but that's another lifetime. But the mind doth wander during reflection.

Back to Havana. I love Havana. It's a cool town. It's an Illinois River town. There's been some great music bars in Havana. There is so much native American culture around there that one of the music clubs in Havana, and I wouldn't be surprised if it is still going, pretty much as it was back then, had most all of the walls covered with displays of arrowheads and other native American artifacts. I mean like thousands. Of course, every place has it's issues, but as far as towns go it is in an interesting location and has preserved much of it's historical character.

But the coolest thing about the Havana area is the sand dunes. There are these areas, overmanaged but mostly preserved, managed by the IDNR, that have natural communities that are completely different from anywhere else in Illinois. It's sort of like the great lakes sand dune communities, but it has a bit of the Florida panhandle dunes to it also. Right in Illinois!

We have this clump of sand phlox that is blooming right now in our back yard near our house. We got a start from a piece that had been uprooted by a road grater on a sand road up in the Havana area. Now it is a huge clump, and gorgeous. We love it. I'll try and get a photo of it posted. So I have positive feelings toward Havana, Illinois. ! I always felt close to Dr. Steingraber because of my familiarity with Havana and that part of Illinois. That's why I wanted Sarah to read the book. But the collage of her reading the book with her "anniversary" has been a powerful combination. All of this really has my mind going.

Back to the Courier. Even before I came to Macomb, The Courier had begun to speak out against the government. For God's sake, it was the late 60s and early 70s. College kids didn't like being drafted and sent to Vietnam. Some of the leaders of the local student white panther group, such as central Illinois writer and activist Bill Knight, got into key positions on the Courier.

Macomb, however, at that time, had a very entrenched and powerful local conservative faction. They were funded primarily by the cornerstone bank on the square, I think it was City national or something like that. These local conservative interests, including the churches, were and probably still are deeply entertwined with university economics and politics.

Those interests were outraged that a university funded paper could speak out against the government in such an irreverant manner. And, you have to give them credit, because I don't think this happened very often, (although I don't know for sure) but they put their money where their mouth was, and actually funded an alternative paper - the "Catalyst," which also had an office on the other corner of the square, competed for ads with "local" businesses, and put out a pro government position, particularly on the Vietnam war. In the aftermath of the worst of those tumultuous times, the Catalyst quietly went away and the Courier has since returned to campus. I don't, for the most part, keep up with it, although I do get emails from friends in Macomb.

Anyway, I digress. I don't know why I'm thinking about Macomb tonight. I was talking about my day today, and now I've been on a time trip back to another lifetime of Mark. 

Back to today. On my myspace page www.myspace.com/markdonhammusic I undated my status and mood this afternoon. I basically said that my status was that I hoped that I could take my long underwear off once and for all this spring. I think my mood was pretty good way back then. I'm not sure what it is now.

I like to be told things that make me stop. But I don't like to be told things that make me cry. I do a lot of crying inside. A man's not supposed to cry, at least that's what the song says. And I am very vulnerable to a good song. I think the lesson is, that an anniversary isn't, in and of itself, a cause for celebration. But it is a time for reflection.

Pres. Obama performs

Wow, it's been almost a month since I posted an entry in Rural Thoughts. I guess I needed some time off. Actually, it's been a very busy time both trying to clean up from the ice storm, and get the garden in, but also to continue to work on songwriting and keep our jobs going. But, as the days get longer, and our electric supply goes up, and we are starting to catch up a little on the gardening and such, I am wanting to get started back in more frequent posts. 

It's been facinating and impressive to watch President Obama operate in his new job. I still stand by my posts that he leaned too much on Washington and party insiders for his cabinet and close advisors. I don't think it has served him that well, and he's had to eat crow a couple times now, unnecessarily. But he has handled it well. It's just so nice to be represented by an intelligent, friendly person, who shows strength but not shallow arrogance. Bush's problem was that his arrogance wasn't based on any kind of deserving. 

I mean, Dizzy Dean, the former colorful St. Louis Cards pitcher, once said, in response to comments by some that he was boastful, that "it ain't braggin' if you can do it." Bush bragged but he couldn't do it. So why was he acting so rude and in everyone's face? It was intolerable for the people on the other end, and it was intolerable for us, as the American people to have to sit by and watch us represented so poorly. What a breath of fresh air to have a representative that isn't embarassing us.

It's still early in Obama's administration. In many agencies, he has not gotten his people into the key undersecretary positions, and therefore the impact of his presidency hasn't been felt that much yet. But that is changing as we speak. Give him a year and his influence will be felt in agencies such as the Forest Service. We'll see where that goes.

I still tend to be more conservative fiscally. I'm more in tune with the European leaders in that solving a problem of bad debts with more debt is questionable. But I do think that infusing all this money into the economy will have an immediate stimulative effect. But seems to me like we are heading down the road for higher interest rates. I don't mind that myself because I don't borrow that much and am collecting interest. But, I'm not sure it's good for the economy to have sustained high interest rates. I don't see how it will be avoided. 

I also think that too much money is going to the big money interests who have screwed things up, and not enough to the lower income levels. I'm sure Obama is trying to figure out some way to do this, and I know it would be a challenge, but it seems like giving these ungodly amounts of money to this mega institutions is throwing good money after bad.

Ultimately, it seems to me that an economy based on maximizing consumption isn't sustainable. We need to re-look at our whole approach toward "economic growth." According to the theories of ecological succession, stable ecosystems evolve to a point where production and consumption are pretty even, with production slightly more than consumption. Life can go on with minimal disruptions for long periods of time under that scenario. Striving for maximum growth causes the booms and busts that are so damaging. 

That's all for now. I'm going to update on local things soon.